Hacking the meta ray-ban smartglasses

(p0pcycle.com)

19 points | by moooooky 3 days ago ago

6 comments

  • RobMurray 5 minutes ago

    It's really sad that getting a shell on a device you own is now considered a vulnerability.

  • mzajc an hour ago

    This is a very neat and approachable write-up, but is the final result really a hack? If I understand correctly, you're getting an unprivileged shell on a device you own and have paired with your smartphone; more or less equivalent to installing a terminal emulator on your smartphone, except it's smart glasses in this case.

    Should the ability to own one's devices really be treated as a vulnerability and reported to security teams?

    • no-dr-onboard an hour ago

      "hack" on hackernews essentially means "I used my computer to do something". The overwhelming population of people here aren't security engineers, but rather developers.

      • mzajc an hour ago

        I considered that, but the mentions of pwn2own and the bug bounty program have me thinking "hack" is used in the security/mainstream sense.

    • stavros 32 minutes ago

      How is it not a hack to do something on a device that doesn't let you do it? Yes, the device should let you do whatever you want, but it doesn't, therefore this is a hack.

      I'm going to try it on my glasses, and disable autoupdating ASAP.

  • frenchsalmon 35 minutes ago

    Nice. How robust is this with software upgrades though? Also looks like arbitrary code execution in the app sandbox, so no persistance?