The bridge to agent-scale Git infrastructure

(github.blog)

43 points | by Klaster_1 6 hours ago ago

11 comments

  • cosmic_quanta 7 minutes ago

    I'm surprised at the level of detail presented in this post. Say what you will about the product, but I appreciate lifting the veil on what goes on behind the scenes.

  • MobileVet 36 minutes ago

    I wonder if this post was planned prior to Anthropic's announcement regarding Github's inability to handle their volume of merges.

    https://www.anthropic.com/research/redesigning-source-contro...

  • shibel 4 hours ago

    Thanks I just want my GitHub actions to not break every so often though.

    • Kinrany 36 minutes ago

      I'll settle for git operations and PR merges not breaking.

    • da_chicken 3 hours ago

      I thought breaking every so often was already the dominant feature of GitHub actions.

      • onion2k 2 hours ago

        Chaos engineering as a service.

      • intothemild 3 hours ago

        Yeah how else am I supposed to take a break or an afternoon nap

  • slowin 19 minutes ago

    I'm so tired of them whining about how hard it is to scale due to agents. First of all, GitHub uptime has always been bad, even before the MS acquisition and way before agents. Secondly, plenty of other services have much more demanding scale problems with much better uptime. How many millions of hours of video is YouTube streaming and transcoding? When was the last time YouTube went down? I'm done with the excuses and have moved to self-hosting.

  • JohnMakin 3 hours ago

    This is so tone deaf in timing, it could only be microsoft, and it (weirdly) makes me feel better.

    • lemonish97 3 hours ago

      Why is this "tone deaf in timing"? Isn't this addressing gh's biggest bottleneck at the moment?

    • philipallstar 2 hours ago

      Commentary on PR strategy is really low quality commentary.