The ephedrine (or pseudoephedrine) synthesis is a one step using phosphorus/iodine reduction directly to methamphetamine. Itâs simple and clean in that only an acid base extraction is required, and only one set of NP solvents.
All these others syntheses with multiple steps up the chances of weird toxic solvents or contaminants creeping in. I think itâs a contaminant issue thatâs exacerbated by the drug use.
The government should just regulate it, control purity and production and let people access small amounts for recreation/performance. Itâs not an evil drug per se - long history before it was criminalized. Plus that would neuter the cartels and protect peopleâs health more than pushing it underground.
Check out the book âThe Fort Bragg Cartelâ if youâre wondering why drugs are illegal even if legalization makes more sense from a harm reduction standpoint. The highest levels of the military are involved in drug trafficking. Use of drugs by clandestine colonial states goes all the way back to the opium wars. US is nothing new. The deep state funds off the books operations with drug money and possibly human trafficking as well.
Tried clicking the fivethirtyeight link halfway down the article, and was immediately reminded of what abc decided to start doing today. What an asshole move.
>He points out that âoldâ meth was made from ephedrine and that ânewâ meth is made from a chemical called Phenylacetone or P2P
the new is just the old that came back. The old meth, "biker meth", was P2P. Then was ephedrine, and with a crackdown on ephedrine - back to P2P.
Another interesting thing - the recent shortage of ADHD medication while supposedly illegal meth production has been growing. Demand is present in both cases while capitalism model of responding with supply works well only in one.
In the former case, you have government artificially suppressing supply and acting to dissuade pharmacies from keeping almost any extra stock, which is unfortunate.
I think the biggest takeaway for me is just how insanely ineffective banning pseudoephedrine over the counter was.
Price went down, usage went up overdose went up, seizures went up, the production just changed quickly and there wasnât even a blip.
Billions of uses of bullshit decongestant products that didnât work at all⌠and to get the good stuff you still need to buy it from behind the counter and give ID.
I don't think its innate though - most people I've met can think of higher order consequences or at least understand them.
The real issue is actually measuring results. I think we have to design society to factor higher order effects in. That means a fundamentally new approach to things like voting and tracking accountability.
Is it even possible? Who knows. Sometimes I think our problems have outstripped individual life spans which makes them intractable.
The other day I needed pseudoephedrine, so I asked for one box of instant tablets and one box of extended release capsules. The store said theyâre only allowed to sell me one box so I had to choose.
Iâm so glad these policies made it so meth isnât super easy to find anymore.
Oh wait, meth is still dirt cheap fucking everywhere, but now I also canât get effective cold medicine either. Can we please just admit this policy doesnât have any effect on the meth supply curve and please put pseudoephedrine back in Dayquil?
The ephedrine (or pseudoephedrine) synthesis is a one step using phosphorus/iodine reduction directly to methamphetamine. Itâs simple and clean in that only an acid base extraction is required, and only one set of NP solvents.
All these others syntheses with multiple steps up the chances of weird toxic solvents or contaminants creeping in. I think itâs a contaminant issue thatâs exacerbated by the drug use.
The government should just regulate it, control purity and production and let people access small amounts for recreation/performance. Itâs not an evil drug per se - long history before it was criminalized. Plus that would neuter the cartels and protect peopleâs health more than pushing it underground.
Check out the book âThe Fort Bragg Cartelâ if youâre wondering why drugs are illegal even if legalization makes more sense from a harm reduction standpoint. The highest levels of the military are involved in drug trafficking. Use of drugs by clandestine colonial states goes all the way back to the opium wars. US is nothing new. The deep state funds off the books operations with drug money and possibly human trafficking as well.
Tried clicking the fivethirtyeight link halfway down the article, and was immediately reminded of what abc decided to start doing today. What an asshole move.
What are you referring to?
The insane thing for me is seeing how tightly meth purity correlated with the airing of Breaking Bad.
>He points out that âoldâ meth was made from ephedrine and that ânewâ meth is made from a chemical called Phenylacetone or P2P
the new is just the old that came back. The old meth, "biker meth", was P2P. Then was ephedrine, and with a crackdown on ephedrine - back to P2P.
Another interesting thing - the recent shortage of ADHD medication while supposedly illegal meth production has been growing. Demand is present in both cases while capitalism model of responding with supply works well only in one.
In the former case, you have government artificially suppressing supply and acting to dissuade pharmacies from keeping almost any extra stock, which is unfortunate.
Fantastic write up.
I think the biggest takeaway for me is just how insanely ineffective banning pseudoephedrine over the counter was.
Price went down, usage went up overdose went up, seizures went up, the production just changed quickly and there wasnât even a blip.
Billions of uses of bullshit decongestant products that didnât work at all⌠and to get the good stuff you still need to buy it from behind the counter and give ID.
Human society has a massive issue with blindness towards n-order effects (they barely consider second-order effects, never mind thinking further out)
I don't think its innate though - most people I've met can think of higher order consequences or at least understand them.
The real issue is actually measuring results. I think we have to design society to factor higher order effects in. That means a fundamentally new approach to things like voting and tracking accountability.
Is it even possible? Who knows. Sometimes I think our problems have outstripped individual life spans which makes them intractable.
That's all correct, and nobody seems to care. Nobody is ever going to improve the system, and us law abiding citizens are left with the consequences.
The other day I needed pseudoephedrine, so I asked for one box of instant tablets and one box of extended release capsules. The store said theyâre only allowed to sell me one box so I had to choose.
Iâm so glad these policies made it so meth isnât super easy to find anymore.
Oh wait, meth is still dirt cheap fucking everywhere, but now I also canât get effective cold medicine either. Can we please just admit this policy doesnât have any effect on the meth supply curve and please put pseudoephedrine back in Dayquil?
Thanks China.